Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] doubtful about libjpeg-turbo vs. libjpeg binary compatibility
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:26:20
Message-Id: 4F2653E7.4050803@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] doubtful about libjpeg-turbo vs. libjpeg binary compatibility by Samuli Suominen
1 On 1/19/12 6:42 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
2 >> a) changing the virtual/jpeg dependency to>=libjpeg-turbo-...
3 >
4 > will be done soon as 1.2.0 is released and stabilized, i'd like to skip
5 > 1.1.90
6
7 Sounds good to me.
8
9 > a) is fine, preventing any downgrades. a fatal check, like glibc and
10 > qt4 has to prevent downgrading is an option too, but a bit overkill imho
11
12 Agreed, in my opinion such a check would be a bad idea. People might
13 have reasons to temporarily downgrade libjpeg-turbo.
14
15 An elog notice could be worthwhile though.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature