| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
In trying to track down some of the dependency problems/mess in the KDE stuff, |
| 4 |
I come to you with a question: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
How are DEPEND="" statements handled when inheriting an eclass? That is, if I |
| 7 |
do this: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
inherit blah |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
DEPEND="pkg1 pkg2" |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
How does the inheritance of blah have an effect on the DEPEND="". Does it |
| 14 |
just overwrite it, does it append.. etc? Or is it "proper" to tack in a |
| 15 |
DEPEND="$DEPEND pkg1 pkg2"? What about RDEPEND automagically getting DEPEND |
| 16 |
values? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Sorry if this is stupidly obvious, but it's not addressed in the docs and |
| 19 |
nobody has been able to answer the question thus far. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
Caleb |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives