From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: tcsh vs. csh, removal of the latter | ||
Date: | Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:04:19 | ||
Message-Id: | 200601290301.17930.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: tcsh vs. csh, removal of the latter by "Marcelo Góes" |
1 | On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:30, Marcelo Góes wrote: |
2 | > On 1/28/06, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > > The question here now actually is: "is csh worth the hassle, or not?" |
4 | > > My opinion is that it is not. |
5 | > |
6 | > csh_is_not_worth_it++; |
7 | > It is causing trouble and not adding functionality. Unless there are |
8 | > cases where tcsh is not backwards compatible, I say it is a good |
9 | > riddance. |
10 | |
11 | i say keeeeeeeeell it |
12 | -mike |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |