| 1 |
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:13:06 +0200 |
| 2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:06:08 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:01:58 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > So you suggest we work around a bug in the PM which would be a |
| 8 |
> > > single fix. Everywhere. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Dynamic dependencies is not fixable. It's an irredeemably broken |
| 11 |
> > concept. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> It works fine for me. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You should read the relevant bugs before making such a bold claim... |
| 16 |
You're illustrating why we have the problem to begin with: you're |
| 17 |
confusing "I've not noticed it go wrong, or realised that breakages |
| 18 |
I've seen are because of this" with "works fine". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives