Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:25:48
Message-Id: CAJ0EP42PZT1U8UE6DFFDv2fZiPqqaL0ZXOQ9V-H2+=yn70oYXA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11 by Martin Vaeth
1 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote:
2 > Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On 20/10/14 06:58 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
4 >>
5 >>> I don't think we'll ever want to support a mixed abi system.
6 >>
7 >> Can we, even? Would it be a mixed-abi system or a multi-abi system?
8 >
9 > I am afraid, we *have* to, in the moment when at least one program
10 > adds -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 by itself (which AFAIK chromium does;
11 > also eix does, if it can).
12
13 FYI, Chromium currently has a ban on using C++ 11 library features. I
14 imagine that helps on a system/toolchain with C++ 98 libs.
15
16 http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/

Replies