Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ideas/bugs
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:46:15
Message-Id: 1015256941.12551.5.camel@workshop.saharact.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: ideas/bugs by Christian Loitsch
1 On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 15:34, Christian Loitsch wrote:
2 > here some updates:
3 >
4 > After some grepping I found the /etc/rc.conf file.
5 > I then made some research on the net to find the best consolefonts, and
6 > read in the french-howto that I should use the iso15-latin9 font.
7 > Couldn't find it :(
8 > On freshmeat.net/kbd somebody mentioned that kbd was more up to date
9 > then console-tools and surprise surprise: kbd has this font (at least I
10 > think it's the right one: lat9w-16).
11 >
12 > > * depscan is maybe not called with the right params in the boot-scripts:
13 > > depscan: Usage depscan ....
14 > Even though it gives this usage-message, the script seems to be executed
15 > without any errors.
16 >
17 > > * why do you ask users in you manual to execute depmod, if it is in 1 of
18 > > your boot-scripts?
19 > it is not a big deal, but at least I did not print the manual, but read
20 > it with less. And when I rebootet (of course a little bit nervous ;),
21 > it just made me even more nervous to focus on not forgetting to execute
22 > something later on...
23 > > * I guess the best way to avoid "broken" Gentoos because of forgetting
24 > > the -w option with nano, would be to make an alias right at the
25 > > beginning. (like nanow)
26 > I agree with Martin that in that it's better to educate, but let's be
27 > honest, who uses nano? At least all editors I use normally (ok, that's
28 > only vim ;) don't have this problem.
29 >
30 > > * because of wrong parameters the pcmcia-boot-script failed. But there
31 > > was no message. like [ FAIL ]
32 > hope nobody got this wrong. The reason the script failed, was that I
33 > moved the modules to another place, because I did not (and still don't)
34 > understand why cardmgr... loaded modules I compiled into the kernel. (
35 > as stars and not as M odules)
36 > Nevertheless there is something wrong with the PCMCIA-package.
37 >
38 > 1) cardmgr is a daemon and because my machine is sooooo slow, it doesn't
39 > have enough time to load all modules for my network-card.
40 > If I add a sleep 2 inside my net.eth0 everything works fine.
41 > I have _no_ idea how this could easily be fixed. (unless you let
42 > cardmgr call the right scripts, which of course is correct, but "ugly")
43 > 2) the pcmcia "-script" , even though in /etc/runlevels/default, does
44 > not produce a link in /dev/shm/.init.d/started. There is a directory in
45 > /dev/shm/.init.d/use/pcmcia containing a link to net.eth0 though.
46 > 3) obviously because of (2) the pcmcia script is called twice. Once for
47 > the net.eth0 script and another time after (on the screen even the last
48 > one)
49
50 Strange one. It should create the /dev/shm/.init.d/started/pcmcia link
51 if the script executed properly. If it do not have the green ok, it
52 means 2 things: 1) no 'eend' is present in the script. 2) it fails and
53 should give you a red '!!'
54
55 Other posiblity is a bug in the runscript.sh script. It however sounds
56 like the script fails, as there was a bug with the previous baselayout
57 that caused a script to start multiple times if it keeps failing. This
58 is fixed in the latest baselayout.
59
60 So, back to the pcmcia script. I can check it for syntax errors, but
61 the how and innerworkings of pcmcia is not known to me as I do not use
62 a notebook.
63
64 If possible, update to the latest baselayout (1.7.2 .. maybe 1.7.2-r1 or
65 1.7.3 that should come out tonight), and give feedback again. If you
66 can debug the problem, so the better.
67
68
69 > 4) the pcmcia-script does not "produce" a green star and no ok.
70 > It also is closed because of sending the term-signal to everyone
71 > and not because of calling pcmcia stop.
72 >
73 > Ignore my last untested point! (from the original mail)
74 > Everything is fine. I did not imagine that the scripts were this
75 > clever, and would insert them into /dev/shm/.init.d/started, even
76 > when called manually.
77 >
78 > At the moment I tend to fill out 2 bug-reports:
79 > 1) no ok for the pcmcia-script
80 > 2) race-condition
81 >
82 > Anything else?
83 >
84 > Christian
85 >
86 > _______________________________________________
87 > gentoo-dev mailing list
88 > gentoo-dev@g.o
89 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
90 --
91 Martin Schlemmer
92 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
93 Cape Town, South Africa

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ideas/bugs "Chad M. Huneycutt" <chadh@×××××××××.edu>