1 |
On 01/22/2014 11:36 AM, hasufell wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> People already do that without revoking commit access, e.g. when the |
5 |
> recruitment project tells you they don't want to process your recruit |
6 |
> or when project leads don't respond to membership applications at all |
7 |
> or when the ComRel lead is not interested in a private discussion. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> And then they seem surprised when you get pissed. And they even seem |
10 |
> clueless about why the working atmosphere in the gentoo-dev community |
11 |
> is pretty bad. It is not, because someone has a strong opinion. |
12 |
> Everyone has, at times. It's about that attitude of telling people |
13 |
> that you are not good enough for their time. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> So this is already happening. The proposal here is just a "logical" |
16 |
> consequence to this situation. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
sorry for messing up that mail, it was a reply to |
20 |
|
21 |
On 01/22/2014 08:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:> I don't want to appear |
22 |
rude, but when reading this entire mail all I see |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Do you realise the message that is sent by denying someone access? You |
25 |
> are saying that person is not good enough to work on Gentoo. Do you |
26 |
> really want to send that message? |