Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:53:23
Message-Id: 4569711A.80106@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc by Daniel Drake
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Daniel Drake wrote:
5 > Sven Köhler wrote:
6 >> Have you ever thought about sollutions of that problem? It's not a real
7 >> problem, that these files are orphaned - but they are neither removed
8 >> nor renamed, so they stay in place and in one or the other way, they may
9 >> start to disturb.
10 >
11 > Wasn't portage modified to remove unmodified config-protected files on
12 > unmerge a while back?
13
14 It's not quite as simple as it sounds, due to interactions between
15 merge and unmerge phases.
16
17 >
18 > If not, is this a sensible suggestion?
19 >
20 > Daniel
21 >
22
23 Yes, it's quite sensible. It's fixed in svn now and I'll release it
24 as soon as it's had enough testing. Watch bug 8423 for progress...
25
26 Zac
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
29
30 iD8DBQFFaXEZ/ejvha5XGaMRAlZRAKCSF3FThVZKoiSZ3kLAS1McPjOtGgCg3fKv
31 CYNZsSG0moQSKscaSeGr/0I=
32 =AYBj
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list