1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Daniel Drake wrote: |
5 |
> Sven Köhler wrote: |
6 |
>> Have you ever thought about sollutions of that problem? It's not a real |
7 |
>> problem, that these files are orphaned - but they are neither removed |
8 |
>> nor renamed, so they stay in place and in one or the other way, they may |
9 |
>> start to disturb. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Wasn't portage modified to remove unmodified config-protected files on |
12 |
> unmerge a while back? |
13 |
|
14 |
It's not quite as simple as it sounds, due to interactions between |
15 |
merge and unmerge phases. |
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> If not, is this a sensible suggestion? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Daniel |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Yes, it's quite sensible. It's fixed in svn now and I'll release it |
24 |
as soon as it's had enough testing. Watch bug 8423 for progress... |
25 |
|
26 |
Zac |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
|
30 |
iD8DBQFFaXEZ/ejvha5XGaMRAlZRAKCSF3FThVZKoiSZ3kLAS1McPjOtGgCg3fKv |
31 |
CYNZsSG0moQSKscaSeGr/0I= |
32 |
=AYBj |
33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |