Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:04:32
Message-Id: 4DE65793.3020601@gentoo.org
In Reply to: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling) by Peter Volkov
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 01/06/2011 04:08 μμ, Peter Volkov wrote:
5 > В Пнд, 30/05/2011 в 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring пишет:
6 >> The problem is, that's a *fuzzy* definition.
7 >
8 > Ok, let's start with something and then we'll add more items if
9 > required. Currently I'd like to propose following text:
10 >
11 > The ChangeLog must be updated with each commit. The only possible
12 > relaxations for this rule are:
13 >
14 > 1. Nonfunctional whitespace changes
15 > 2. Changes in comments (lines starting with # in ebuild, or leading text
16 > in patches)
17 > 3. Manifest updates
18 > 4. Changes in ChageLog itself ;)
19 >
20 > Something unclear? Anything else?
21 >
22 > --
23 > Peter.
24 Maybe typos in e{log,warn,info} messages and/or typos in general (
25 variables, functions etc )
26
27 - --
28 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
31
32 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJN5leTAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCztAP/2GIXm1yllZX1r1IBErUoLGG
33 aO+8RGSgFrdT5SskyqA5Gbah+5XMzCyVEidebxst5JNSbpnKlRFPAvSJQUgHnJiD
34 +mQXizqqjJpbDBs0ktXFQIepXpUZ3vKUKAw8BG2fJ2thblBFA+A8V02cTF4mE5iV
35 HwiR2+0LGFVfR3HB2Q1Udbz24GIXxIFjhCzHW34f273VhBMWoUfaYxLAlFIPsnEn
36 TCvLwgdgSZqRIOH7+QyZHTVwvexVqHTu0mUWRTkCFoDX58PLfE4UolpRZGY/g/4n
37 MUDwmTvMaC7q90JhskCCCBcORgLnQpv4pqaTD6XV8x7Dnk96oT1BgDY7j5tu2Ezj
38 dp3ZPsPlf36xjYO9SGxu24KJvbb0DSeCxqN27EYa0p4yE/zAWyve2TsPX5lTdiVF
39 jZIrzoCBpBAu8/ggUBIDZOwgXMbHj2xTu2b1QFo2XOI+xSl57V+O5u2cuhEtQYYR
40 6kcK44cIYjKEUjroaxcn5CaIpOzmEuGq1O+1cNM+s7jXqPSQswa9EnJ5NyXs2IHw
41 EAOpqOpuQdNnk0cPqYv2zKhvTiP7Y6mR7aFA7zMOKPOD2Eh3E1BksPHk7hIKIjoS
42 nsVQ0f2sBntBUUmcc21QlPe5iSIuRrtj9hc3xiS2B4GygjiAflp443VL46ytjlH5
43 vlm5PBCN8ZZx0AvPc6n/
44 =Hnq4
45 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs Nathan Phillip Brink <binki@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>