1 |
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 15:50 +0000, Ian Leitch wrote: |
2 |
> This system also gives power back to the devs (and users if they're |
3 |
> allowed to vote) and away from the GLEP editors. |
4 |
|
5 |
Another abuse of power by the management trying to keep the little man |
6 |
down! Oh the injustice! |
7 |
|
8 |
Sorry, man, but if you can't take the 30 minutes to write up a |
9 |
well-written proposal in a readable and already established format, then |
10 |
how can you possibly expect others to take the idea seriously? (This |
11 |
isn't meant to be pointing against you, Ian.) |
12 |
|
13 |
The truth is that there are a lot of good ideas that die on the vine |
14 |
simply because there isn't enough interest in them, or they aren't |
15 |
thought out to a usable state. I think we have also seen that sometimes |
16 |
even a good idea just doesn't have enough momentum to keep it going. |
17 |
Couple that with the fact that most of the work done on Gentoo doesn't |
18 |
affect Gentoo on a global scope, and hence, doesn't require a GLEP, and |
19 |
I would say the system has worked pretty well. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
24 |
Games - Developer |
25 |
Gentoo Linux |