Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Syroid <tom@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:08:33
Message-Id: 127230000.1058364467@phaedrus.syroidmanor.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable by Seemant Kulleen
1 Seemant,
2
3 Emerging said apps as we speak; will advise.
4
5 The box is a (was ;-) stable dual 2200+ Athlon system with 2.4.20-rc5 and
6 2.6.0-test1, so any potential weirdness should surface in relatively short
7 order.
8
9 Best,
10 /tom
11
12 --On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 06:50:33 -0700 Seemant Kulleen
13 <seemant@g.o> wrote:
14
15 > Hi All,
16 >
17 > We'd like to receive comments (the negative ones, especially) for moving
18 > gcc-3.2.3-r1, glibc-2.3.2-r1 and binutils-2.14.90.0.2 from ~arch to arch
19 > (at least for x86 platform).
20 >
21 > Thanks,
22 >
23 > --
24 > Seemant Kulleen
25 > Developer and Project Co-ordinator,
26 > Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant
27 >
28 > Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E
29 > Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E
30
31
32
33
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list