From: | Dan Douglas <ormaaj@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
Date: | Wed, 23 May 2012 21:16:43 | ||
Message-Id: | 1473095.PKeReGjyol@smorgbox | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Robin H. Johnson" |
1 | On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 04:47:04 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 | > 2. rsync generation is NOT going away. Users will still be using it. |
3 | Would users have a way of gaining read-only access? This would be EXTREMELY |
4 | helpful. If not I will be leaving Gentoo for Funtoo in the near future, though |
5 | there are disadvantages to doing this I don't look forward to dealing with. |
6 | -- |
7 | Dan Douglas |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |