| 1 |
неділя, 15. січень 2006 12:43, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) Ви написали: |
| 2 |
> If the 2005 does turn out to be a release date rather than the |
| 3 |
> standard name, then it makes sense as a release version; gnat-gpl-2005 |
| 4 |
> would be enough. Later releases can add a point revision if necessary; |
| 5 |
> if you do 2005.1 now, what happens if upstream release |
| 6 |
> gnat-gpl-2005.1.tgz? |
| 7 |
Good point. I kind of assumed that this just stands for the standard name, but |
| 8 |
it indeed may be used as a version number upstream. Well, I guess the only |
| 9 |
way to know is to pester them a bit more to see if they made up their mind |
| 10 |
about versioning.. Oh, well, here goes my hope to start commits today :). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Another possibility is gnat-gpl-3.4.5.2005, but I'm not sure that it's |
| 14 |
> worth it. |
| 15 |
Yea, 2005 looks not very much in line with the rest of it, although is a valid |
| 16 |
"release" number.. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
George |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives