1 |
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 23:28, Dan Armak wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 03 February 2002 19:05, you wrote: |
3 |
> > I thought about this, but didn't implement it that way since portage |
4 |
> > seems to be 'greedy' by default. With that I mean that '--pretend' also |
5 |
> > has to be explicitly specified to prevent actions from happening. |
6 |
> > Therefor I think it's more logical to have to specify '--safe' |
7 |
> > explicitly too. |
8 |
> While unmerge functionality is still in testing, I propose that we rename |
9 |
> --safe to --old or similar. IMO it' makes a lot more sense, since unmerging |
10 |
> without --safe isn't unsafe, it's just different. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> We might also (eventually) make a stub or symlink unmerge -> emerge --unmerge. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> These are small things which might seem unimportant, but I think they help |
15 |
> create a more unified and intuitive interface to portage. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
ditto |
19 |
|
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> Dan Armak |
22 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team (KDE) |
23 |
> Matan, Israel |
24 |
> _______________________________________________ |
25 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
26 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
27 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
28 |
-- |
29 |
|
30 |
Martin Schlemmer |
31 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer |
32 |
Cape Town, South Africa |