1 |
Dnia 20 kwietnia 2016 06:52:24 CEST, Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o> napisał(a): |
2 |
>On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 +0000 (UTC) |
4 |
>> "Patrice Clement" <monsieurp@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> > commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050 |
7 |
>> > Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
8 |
>> > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:35:31 2016 +0000 |
9 |
>> > Commit: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
10 |
>> > CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:13 2016 +0000 |
11 |
>> > URL: |
12 |
>https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4f2477ca |
13 |
> |
14 |
>... |
15 |
> |
16 |
>> > - <description>CC on bugs</description> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> You're discarding important information here. This also has been |
19 |
>> covered in the GLEP. The suggested solution is to copy the person |
20 |
>into |
21 |
>> downstream maintainers with appropriate explanatory description (like |
22 |
>> 'upstream developer wishing to be CC-ed on bugs'). |
23 |
> |
24 |
>Just an FYI: |
25 |
>Members of the Proxy Maintainers project decided that the inclusion of |
26 |
>the |
27 |
><description /> element was superfluous and that the ordering of |
28 |
><maintainer /> |
29 |
>elements was sufficient for determining bug assignment/CC'ing based on |
30 |
>the |
31 |
>bug-wranglers policy[0] (which does not explicitly mention <description |
32 |
>/>). |
33 |
|
34 |
Just FYI, we're talking about upstream maintainer elements which do not take part in bug assignment. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Best regards, |
39 |
Michał Górny (by phone) |