| 1 |
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:32 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> That nothing that you've said counters the package not being needed in |
| 3 |
> the system target. In fact, the packages that you list all explicitly |
| 4 |
> depend on debianutils, so they wouldn't break if we removed it from |
| 5 |
> system. The problem is packages which require debianutils but do *not* |
| 6 |
> depend on it, because it's in "system" now. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'm running a stage build with debianutils removed from system. I'll |
| 9 |
let everyone know the results. If it works, I'll do the same for a |
| 10 |
LiveDVD build, which covers most of the major packages in the tree. |
| 11 |
Sure, there might be a few stragglers after that, but I doubt that there |
| 12 |
would be too many. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 16 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 17 |
Games Developer |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives