Archives
Archives
| From: | "Paweł Hajdan | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 May 2011 15:54:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DC0250E.3070001@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency by Kfir Lavi |
||
| 1 | On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: |
| 2 | > In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | See |
| 5 | <http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/dependencies/index.html#implicit-system-dependency> |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > Why sys-devel/gcc don't have a library version without the actual compiler? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | This question may be a bit hard to understand, at least for me. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency | Mike Gilbert <floppymaster@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: ACE gcc and libc dependency | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com> |