1 |
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: |
2 |
> More and more, I am finding developers who are afraid to touch packages |
3 |
> for even minor things if they're not the maintainer. This is a sad |
4 |
> state of affairs and not the reason we have maintainers. We have |
5 |
> maintainers to assure that a package is being taken care of, not to |
6 |
> establish some kind of "territory" over that package. Because of this |
7 |
> misconception, I would like to come up with and document a listing of |
8 |
> things that any ebuild developer can feel free to do to any package |
9 |
> *without* maintainer consent. These are generally all minor things, but |
10 |
> things that I think are important. I'm going to list off the things |
11 |
> that I can think of, and encourage everyone else to speak up if I've |
12 |
> missed something. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
I don't find anything wrong with doing the changes after you find that |
16 |
the maintainer is not responsive. If the maintainer is responsive, he |
17 |
will a) do the changes b) give you the permission to do it c) give |
18 |
reasoning on why the proposed changes should not be done. |
19 |
|
20 |
Regards, |
21 |
Petteri |