1 |
foser wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:58 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
>>Hash: SHA1 |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>Luca Barbato schrieb: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>>Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>>>alpha++ |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>>alpha++ |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>>once again, alpha++ |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> It's not a vote, it's a discussion. You guys--. |
22 |
|
23 |
Whoever said we were voting? I was just showing my support for |
24 |
alphabetical keyword ordering. Remember, alphabetical keywording is |
25 |
*already* implemented in ekeyword, and we are discussing whether or not |
26 |
to revert it. foser-- |
27 |
|
28 |
> |
29 |
> As vapier indicates he's the whole reason this ever became a problem. He |
30 |
> was the one who started arbitrarily ordering keywords around creating a |
31 |
> keywords mess for people who did depend on order to perform tasks. I |
32 |
> guess the lesson here is if you just do things 'your way' (wr/l)ong |
33 |
> enough, people pick it up and it spreads. |
34 |
|
35 |
If everyone starts using ekeyword now with the alphabetical ordering |
36 |
built in, everything will be consistent, and there shouldn't be a problem. |
37 |
|
38 |
> |
39 |
> The point is that with his reordering implicit information was lost for |
40 |
> no particular purpose. There was no added value in ordering keywords, |
41 |
> there's was no reason whatsoever to make the ordering inconsistent |
42 |
> within packages, it was an utterly pointless exercise in creating more |
43 |
> traffic on the servers. |
44 |
|
45 |
I guess by "creating more traffic" you mean the one time when updating |
46 |
the ebuilds with the new ordering during rsync for each user. Even if |
47 |
this is significant over the whole tree, once everything is updated with |
48 |
keyword ordering and everyone has done an emerge sync, there won't be |
49 |
any more trouble, and we can just stay happy with the consistent |
50 |
alphabetical ordering enforced by ekeyword. |
51 |
|
52 |
-Steve |
53 |
-- |
54 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |