Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: debug/release builds extensions/clarification proposal
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:46:25
Message-Id: 200812012246.19162.reavertm@poczta.fm
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: debug/release builds extensions/clarification proposal by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Monday 01 of December 2008 08:04:04 Duncan wrote:
2 > (Of
3 > course, if it's the latter, it will need to be an official GLEP, and
4 > you'll have three separate package managers and their developers to push
5 > the proposal thru to at least to general agreement, or the council will
6 > almost certainly reject the GLEP, if it gets even that far.)
7
8 That I found interesting - what does any 3rd party package manager to do with
9 setting policies and enhancements regarding official Gentoo package manager?
10 Have you ever heard of "liberum veto"? But that's an off topic of course.
11
12 --
13 regards
14 MM

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: debug/release builds extensions/clarification proposal Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>