| 1 |
On 08/15/2016 04:49 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/15/2016 04:19 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'm very much for this as well. Themaintainer should be able to |
| 4 |
>> stabilize on all arches after the timeout. That would solve the primary |
| 5 |
>> concern I have about the stable tree lagging. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It depends on the context, if it is not security related or fixing a |
| 8 |
> known bug, it can cause regression for stable users without much gain. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Elaborating on this, if we're talking about maintainer stabilizing it |
| 12 |
after testing it properly there is no issue, but there shouldn't be a |
| 13 |
policy to auto-mark stable |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 17 |
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 18 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives