| 1 |
> >> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, |
| 2 |
> >> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able |
| 5 |
> > to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than |
| 6 |
> > accusing each other on the lists. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I completely agree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that |
| 9 |
> there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the |
| 10 |
> developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't |
| 11 |
> think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a |
| 12 |
> private discussion be better before going publicly with accusations? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Introducing repoman warnings deliberately is wrong. Point. |
| 15 |
QA can do trivial fixes. Point. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
None of these two points needs any discussion. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) |
| 22 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 23 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives