Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] sys-meta/* to own and control /bin/{cpio,sh,tar,...} symlinks (alternatives-ish)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:26:12
Message-Id: 7b61cac9b0b7156aac134afa9eabd8c1b18045f3.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] sys-meta/* to own and control /bin/{cpio,sh,tar,...} symlinks (alternatives-ish) by Piotr Karbowski
1 On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 14:58 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > On 23/11/2022 08.38, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > Hello, everyone.
6 > >
7 > > TL;DR: I'd like to add sys-meta/{cpio,sh,tar} to install and control
8 > > (via USE flags) /bin/{cpio,sh,tar} symlinks.
9 >
10 > I am very much in favour to have a package that controls those symlinks.
11 > What is not immediately clear to me is what would that mean for eselect
12 > in long run. Is it so that you'd like to keep eselect around and alive
13 > parallel to those sys-meta category packages, or would there be push to
14 > eventually get rid of most of eselect and where possible switch to sys-meta?
15
16 No, I don't think that's going to happen. Sure, switching that will
17 make sense for some packages; for others, eselect will probably be
18 better.
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22 Michał Górny