Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:55:37
Message-Id: 20160420045522.GB26580@cerberus.civica.com.au
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/ by Sam Jorna
1 On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:52:24PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
2 > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
3 > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 +0000 (UTC)
4 > > "Patrice Clement" <monsieurp@g.o> wrote:
5 > >
6 > > > commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050
7 > > > Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
8 > > > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:35:31 2016 +0000
9 > > > Commit: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
10 > > > CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:13 2016 +0000
11 > > > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4f2477ca
12 >
13 > ...
14 >
15 > > > - <description>CC on bugs</description>
16 > >
17 > > You're discarding important information here. This also has been
18 > > covered in the GLEP. The suggested solution is to copy the person into
19 > > downstream maintainers with appropriate explanatory description (like
20 > > 'upstream developer wishing to be CC-ed on bugs').
21 >
22 > Just an FYI:
23 > Members of the Proxy Maintainers project decided that the inclusion of the
24 > <description /> element was superfluous and that the ordering of <maintainer />
25 > elements was sufficient for determining bug assignment/CC'ing based on the
26 > bug-wranglers policy[0] (which does not explicitly mention <description />).
27
28 Forgot the reference (which I probably don't need anyway) but:
29
30 0: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Bug-wranglers#Assigning_bug_reports
31
32 --
33 Sam Jorna
34 GnuPG Key: D6180C26

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature