Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mdev
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:14:53
Message-Id: 87txxa7tuj.fsf@einstein.gmurray.org.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mdev by Walter Dnes
1 "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> writes:
2
3 > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:49:32AM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote
4 >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote:
5 >> > mdev would need to switch to the netlink hotplug interface.
6 >>
7 >> I think that's quite unlikely, since mdev is not a daemon. Perhaps by
8 >> the time /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug is gone, mdev advocates will have
9 >> settled on some early udev fork. [1]
10 >
11 > Do you realize this would effectively kill linux in the embedded
12 > device area? Udev, even without the systemd code, is simply to large
13 > for embedded devices.
14
15 But surely most embedded devices do not need hotplug functionality, they
16 have a known, fixed, set of devices. So should static nodes in /dev/ not
17 be sufficient?

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mdev Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>