| 1 |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:43:57 -0400 |
| 2 |
Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 12/07/12 01:01 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On 12 July 2012 07:42, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò |
| 10 |
> >> wrote: |
| 11 |
> >>> Il 11/07/2012 21:11, William Hubbs ha scritto: |
| 12 |
> >>>> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything |
| 13 |
> >>>> currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. |
| 14 |
> >>> |
| 15 |
> >>> Unless you're going to establish a symlink, please keep it |
| 16 |
> >>> under p.mask until everything is using some common code — |
| 17 |
> >>> otherwise things _will_ break. |
| 18 |
> >> |
| 19 |
> >> Since multiple packages put things in /lib/udev, I'm not sure it |
| 20 |
> >> is possible to establish a symlink from /lib/udev to |
| 21 |
> >> /usr/lib/udev if that's what you mean; I'll look into it though. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Couldn't you, on udev upgrade, move everything in /lib/udev to |
| 24 |
> > /usr/lib/udev, and then make the symlink? Seems fairly simple to |
| 25 |
> > me, but maybe I'm overlooking something? |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> A symlink isn't a good idea as, iirc, the new udev still -reads- from |
| 29 |
> both /usr/lib/udev and /lib/udev .. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Does it? I wasn't able to reproduce and wanted to start convincing Kay |
| 32 |
to let it do that... |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Best regards, |
| 37 |
Michał Górny |
Archives