Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:59:10
Message-Id: 439F3518.5090909@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five) by Dan Meltzer
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi Dan,
5
6 Dan Meltzer schrieb:
7 | Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an
8 ammendatory GLEP
9
10 I would apply these changes to glep-0001.txt:
11 dvandyk@phi glep $ cvs diff glep-0001.txt
12 Index: glep-0001.txt
13 ===================================================================
14 RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.txt,v
15 retrieving revision 1.8
16 diff -u -b -B -r1.8 glep-0001.txt
17 - --- glep-0001.txt 4 Apr 2004 23:05:35 -0000 1.8
18 +++ glep-0001.txt 13 Dec 2005 20:45:37 -0000
19 @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
20 ~ Status: Active
21 ~ Type: Informational
22 ~ Content-Type: text/x-rst
23 - -Created: 31-May-2003
24 - -Post-History: 1-Jun-2003, 2-Jul-2003
25 +Created: 2003-05-31
26 +Post-History: 2003-06-01, 2003-07-02
27
28 Do you _really_ think this make a GLEP necessary?
29
30 Danny
31 - --
32 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
33 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
36
37 iD8DBQFDnzUXaVNL8NrtU6IRAnruAJ4zXT5+gtyvKHi3BbD1EPvJYACCYwCgmG6z
38 FW28Kz5W3N1nFz3ZJuPOEh8=
39 =tVHu
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>