1 |
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: |
2 |
> On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: |
4 |
> >> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see |
5 |
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134 |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible |
8 |
> >> idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken* |
9 |
> >> since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example. |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses |
12 |
> >> epatch! |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> -Alexandre Rostovtsev. |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are |
20 |
> > a lot as I have seen running: |
21 |
> > grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v |
22 |
> > eutils |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when |
25 |
> > an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise |
26 |
> > this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in |
27 |
> > the future :-/ |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Yeah, we have a similar check for inherit of prefix.eclass: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=b583812101f1156c553385effcd9dbee0b751087 |
32 |
|
33 |
Should we (I) open a bug report requesting that or this is enough as |
34 |
report? Thanks :) |