[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps

[Martin Vaeth]

Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
> Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
>> > Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote:
>> > The problems are of a different kind. Static dependencies don't do
>> > something that you want them to do. Dynamic dependencies are
>> > outright broken.
>> Please, stop your childish behaviour.
>> You prove nothing be repeating claims which had just been disproved.
>
> Let's start with the easiest issue: please point us all to the place
> where you "proved" how dynamic dependencies still work in the face of
> ebuild removals.

*Neither* dynamic deps nor static deps solve this problem satisfactory
(How often did I repeat this now?).
Probably there does not exist *any* satisfactory solution to orphaned
packages at all. So this case is not a valid argument to prefer one
method over another.