1 |
On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 17:36 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 17:09 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > +#################################################################### |
4 |
> > +# |
5 |
> > +# This file specifies packages that are considered deprecated (but |
6 |
> > not |
7 |
> > +# masked yet). It will trigger pkgcheck warnings whenever other |
8 |
> > +# packages depend on them. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> repoman would be more useful for this |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Then feel free to take repoman over, and start maintaining it. I've |
15 |
lost interest in contributing to the project after the last pointless |
16 |
refactoring made adding anything even more effort, and it doesn't seem |
17 |
that anyone else has. |
18 |
|
19 |
Given that pkgcheck is a. faster by design, b. running checks |
20 |
in parallel, c. has sane API making contributing a pleasure, I don't |
21 |
really see a point in putting any more effort to support a dead repoman. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |