| 1 |
On 9/18/12 7:07 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:47 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Yes, and sometimes we're doing 'use test'. I simply don't see how |
| 4 |
>> adding a separate group of dependencies just for 'test' phase is going |
| 5 |
>> to help us. They fit just fine into build-time dependencies right now. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It would enable us to consider making tests on some packages optional to |
| 8 |
> break circular dependencies with FEATURES=test, i.e. only run the tests |
| 9 |
> if the test dependencies can be installed without circular dependencies. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175808 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Oh right, this is currently a mess, which makes arch testing more |
| 14 |
difficult and slower. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think it's important to break FEATURES=test circular dependencies. |
Archives