Archives
Archives
| From: | Brian Jackson <iggy@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager | ||
| Date: | Mon, 02 May 2005 19:12:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 42767C63.40400@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager by Michael Haubenwallner |
||
| 1 | Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >Hi ebuild devs, |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >Here's a glep draft now for (a part of) the long-term portage-goal |
| 6 | >"act as a secondary package manager" ... |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | >Comments welcome, |
| 9 | > haubi |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | It's fancy, but what about ROOT? You don't like it just because you'd have /usr/local/usr/bin/foo? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager | Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu> |