Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:43
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by William Hubbs
On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:18:04 -0500
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
> > Not sure I'm following, but I will be the first to admit that I'm a > > git novice. Would this be aided by a convention, like only > > committing to master on the gentoo official repository, and any > > on-the-side work on places like github/etc stays in branches? > > Those repositories would just keep getting fed commits on master > > from the official repository. > > Iagree with this; I think we should ban merge commits on master. That > would force everyone to rebase their work on current master before > they commit to master which would make the history clean.
So what's the point of switching to git if you want to ban the main reason git exists? -- Ciaran McCreesh


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature