1 |
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:49:52 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Of course, if the community insists, I could just update the old |
5 |
> eclass and fix the ebuilds broken that way. |
6 |
|
7 |
The following ebuilds would need fixing if -r1 is to replace -r0 |
8 |
in place: |
9 |
|
10 |
a) naming the tarball ${P}-src.tar.gz: |
11 |
- dev-java/jna, |
12 |
- dev-python/ws4py. |
13 |
|
14 |
They could be easily fixed by either renaming the destination file (it |
15 |
shouldn't collide with anything, I think) or setting appropriate S=. |
16 |
|
17 |
b) downloading .zip for no good reason: |
18 |
- dev-util/ninja (betagarden overlay). |
19 |
|
20 |
If the eclass is to spread, there are two more packages in gx86 using |
21 |
zipballs (which would not be supported by -r1). |
22 |
|
23 |
All the packages mentioned above are from github so they could be |
24 |
easily changed to grab tarballs instead. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Best regards, |
28 |
Michał Górny |