1 |
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:21:31 -0500 |
2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 1/22/17 3:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> >>>> uclibc/amd64 |
7 |
> >>>> uclibc/arm/2.4 |
8 |
> >>>> uclibc/mips/hardened |
9 |
> >>>> uclibc/ppc/2.4 |
10 |
> >>>> uclibc/ppc/hardened/2.4 |
11 |
> >>>> uclibc/sh/2.4 |
12 |
> >>>> uclibc/x86/2.4 |
13 |
> >>>> uclibc/x86/2005.1/2.4 |
14 |
> >>>> uclibc/x86/hardened/2.4 |
15 |
> >> I'm still not sure if anyone uses these. I'm thinking maybe its time |
16 |
> >> for the whole lot of profiles/uclibc/* to go. |
17 |
> > If you need me to, I can look into inlining them into |
18 |
> > default/linux/uclibc. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I don't know what you mean by "inlining" them but I'd rather not mix |
22 |
> them in. I'd rather they were just removed or whoever is using them |
23 |
> take care of them. |
24 |
|
25 |
Oh, sorry, I thought the top uclibc/ directory is actually used |
26 |
somewhere in default/linux. In this case, removing them sounds good to |
27 |
me. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Best regards, |
31 |
Michał Górny |
32 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |