1 |
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:42:46 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| On Friday 11 June 2004 10:25 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
4 |
| > Having documentation on how to bypass the security measures of the |
5 |
| > Xbox violates the DMCA. The xbox-linux guys are simply ignoring |
6 |
| > this and doing "business as usual" by providing this information. I |
7 |
| > have no problems with it myself, just that technically it *is* |
8 |
| > illegal. You have to just love laws that are complete garbage. |
9 |
| |
10 |
| so what we're looking at here (and what was planned on in the first |
11 |
| place) was adding the packages to portage but RESTRICT=nomirror |
12 |
|
13 |
Isn't linking to violating files also in violation of your dumb USian |
14 |
laws? (See, for example: "Waaah! Google, I order you to remove this |
15 |
link.) In other words, we'd have to do one of those horrid fetch |
16 |
restriction things and not include the exact URI in the ebuild? |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
20 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
21 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |