| 1 |
On 29/07/14 03:15, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> x265-1.2.ebuild: KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~x86" |
| 4 |
>> x265-1.3.ebuild: KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" |
| 5 |
>> x265-9999.ebuild: KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> As in... You forgot to add ~arm to -9999.ebuild |
| 8 |
> Wait, what? Live ebuilds are keyworded now? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Denis. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I should have propably only mailed this to maekke, but CC'd the mailing |
| 14 |
list because this |
| 15 |
has been a trend lately, people outright ignore *9999 ebuilds and the |
| 16 |
preparations |
| 17 |
done there for the upcoming releases when they commit non-maintainer |
| 18 |
bumps like, |
| 19 |
well, I don't want to give examples as that'd be "pointing fingers" |
| 20 |
Just that some people think it's better to have poorly done version bump |
| 21 |
to get latest, |
| 22 |
than live with *correct* older version, and thiskind of thinking really |
| 23 |
needs to die... |
| 24 |
There is nothing wrong with old, long as it works |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- Samuli |
Archives