Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: rich0@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] systemd team consensus?
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 18:29:30
Message-Id: 20130811182916.GA5448@linux1
1 I am splitting this to a separate thread, because it could become a
2 long thread pretty easily.
3
4 On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 07:14:00AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
5 > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
6 > > I've been considering packaging systemd in sys-fs/udev with USE="systemd"
7 > > and use of 'if' and 'else' plus creating virtual/systemd for proper /
8 > > installation and some other minor, but bad design choices done in the
9 > > systemd packaging
10 >
11 > What is the consensus of the systemd team regarding those choices?
12 > Would it make more sense to just fix the packaging rather than forking
13 > it? I'm not sure what all the issues are, or how widespread the
14 > disagreement is.
15
16 I am a member of the systemd team, and I know what needs to be done. I
17 have offered patches multiple times the last few months to fix the
18 packaging, only to have them refused, even though I have presented,
19 multiple times, strong recommendations from systemd upstream that I am
20 correct, as well as making it clear that I would take responsibility for
21 breakages the change would cause. Originally, we did install systemd
22 correctly, but that was changed some time back, before I joined the
23 team. All Samuli and I have asked is that the change we made that puts
24 everything in /usr be undone. Besides the udev team, this would have
25 benefits for the gnome team.
26
27 You may ask why I have offered patches instead of just fixing the ebuild
28 since I am a team member. That is because even team members aren't
29 allowed to touch bugs assigned to systemd@g.o [1], and my
30 personal efforts to advocate for this specific change got me this comment as
31 well [2]. This bug, and others like it, would never have come up if
32 we were installing systemd the way upstream recommends.
33
34 I'll keep this short for now unless others here want to see the rest of
35 my evidence, but What it boils down to is this. As a member of the
36 systemd team, I have questioned the way we are doing things, multiple
37 times. I feel that we aren't doing things in the best interest of the
38 distro as a whole. However, consensus doesn't matter on that team; the
39 members are expected to do exactly as they are told.
40
41 William
42
43 [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472792#C11
44 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/478538#C11

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd team consensus? Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd team consensus? Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd team consensus? "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>