Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc and qt
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:43:38
Message-Id: 200212191840.29027.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-dev] gcc and qt by Riyad Kalla
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Thursday 19 December 2002 17:04, Riyad Kalla wrote:
5 > Pieter,
6 > Did you emerge QT 3.1.1 then reemerge the KDE libs? I don't know if this
7 > is "overkill" but is it possible that would have fixed the situation?
8 >
9 > I've seen quite a few people mention the surprise of emerging a new QT
10 > lib, then having KDE break... I sort of assume this to happen since you
11 > are changing the underlying lib, but maybe I am the one that is
12 > mistaken.
13
14 This shouldn't be necessary when upgrading from qt 3.1.0 to 3.1.1.
15
16 >
17 > I've done this so much now that I've not ever bothered to check if
18 > emerge can detect this... i.e. I upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1 QT, does emerge
19 > know that I should recompile my KDE libs? (base/lib, and annything else
20 > important).
21 >
22 > I wouldn't normally do this unless its required, as it takes so long :(,
23 > so it would be great if emerge could suggest or warn me about it.
24
25 The most we can do with the current portage featureset, and have done, is emit
26 a warning message after qt is emerged.
27
28
29 - --
30 Dan Armak
31 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
32 Matan, Israel
33 Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
36
37 iD8DBQE+AfZ9UI2RQ41fiVERAoa7AJoDBhPBU3U+C7szFAhYAxjusDaSsgCeO4hM
38 LBixL1gKcmPvOjOkTihPy5Y=
39 =yENB
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41
42
43 --
44 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list