| 1 |
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 16:08, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 09:42:50 -0400 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I would say it wouldn't hurt to start a project for ensuring Paludis |
| 6 |
> > support in the Portage tree. It would give a bit more credibility to |
| 7 |
> > your cause. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The problem that I see with this is that it would tend to reinforce the |
| 10 |
> view that Paludis is becoming an officially supported package manager, |
| 11 |
> which at the moment at least it isn't. If people are amenable to the |
| 12 |
> idea though, I'm quite willing to set it up. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In my opinion if paludis is not aiming to become an officially supported |
| 15 |
package manager there is no point in changing the tree to that in the |
| 16 |
first place. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paul |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 23 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 24 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives