| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 21:23 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script. |
| 5 |
> | Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me |
| 6 |
> | because I had heard "it takes days"). Doing checkouts caused about the |
| 7 |
> | same load as cvs, but I have no data points on multi-user behaviour. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The interesting part isn't really how long it takes to convert things |
| 10 |
> or how long it takes to do a checkout, since they're in effect one time |
| 11 |
> costs. |
| 12 |
Yes, but generating a "realistic" workload isn't trivial.If we had cvs |
| 13 |
logs to replay we might get some good data. |
| 14 |
> I'm guessing we have at least a hundred full tree updates and a |
| 15 |
> thousand commits for every full checkout... |
| 16 |
Provide us with a script to generate partial updates/commits and I think |
| 17 |
many people will just run it for fun ... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Maybe the nice Infra dudes could provide cvs snapshots for testing? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Patrick |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move |
Archives