Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: bazaar@g.o, Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: robbat2@g.o, arfrever@g.o, sping@g.o, nelchael@××××××.ort, cvs-utils@g.o, djc@g.o, sping@g.o, ricmm@g.o, gregkh@g.o, haskell@g.o, dev-tools@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] New category for version control
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:07:41
1 Hi,
3 as dev-util is really crowded, maybe splitting off a category for
4 source code management systems would be a good idea. They are more
5 important today than some years ago.
6 Are any of you against such a split? My proposal would be to call it
7 dev-scm and put all version controls, direct frontends, plugins and the
8 like into that. Diffing tools or programs that only have some kind of
9 binding to a scm should stay in dev-util.
11 V-Li
13 --
14 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
15 <URL:>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
17 <URL:>


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for version control Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>