1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2022, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> The first possible clarification fits here (I think). Something like: |
4 |
|
5 |
> This GLEP is intended as a policy reference guide for EAPI minimum effective |
6 |
> times. Despite the statistical qualifications listed here no EAPI |
7 |
> will be deprecated or banned without specific Gentoo Council action. |
8 |
|
9 |
> (While this is implied by the "Gentoo Council will..." wording, making it |
10 |
> explicit could prevent later confusion/controversy.) |
11 |
|
12 |
> [...] |
13 |
|
14 |
> The second possible clarification seems to fit about here, but may require |
15 |
> a bit of adjustment to the text above it. |
16 |
|
17 |
> The two 24-month times are effectively additive, yielding a total 48 months |
18 |
> minimum between addition of an EAPI and banning of the previous one. Given |
19 |
> past EAPI history of at minimum a year between EAPI introductions that should |
20 |
> yield a minimum three years of active EAPI life before deprecation, one year |
21 |
> minimum as the newest EAPI plus two years before deprecation, plus two years |
22 |
> of deprecation, for five years total EAPI life before ban. |
23 |
|
24 |
> (This isn't entirely necessary but makes explicit the answer to one of my first |
25 |
> questions reading the proposal. YMMV. I debated spec vs rational, but decided |
26 |
> rational was a better fit.) |
27 |
|
28 |
I'd rather keep the text concise. For the first suggestion, the wording |
29 |
already implies it. For the second one, people can do that maths |
30 |
themselves. |
31 |
|
32 |
Ulrich |