Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | ||
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:42:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200507291740.21108@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Friday 29 July 2005 17:31, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > from a QA point of view, no package should apply a patch, have the patching |
| 3 | > fail, but continue to emerge ... who knows what kind of garbage you'll end |
| 4 | > up with |
| 5 | This can be read as "it's good to use epatch" ? :P |
| 6 | |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 9 | Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 10 | (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> |