Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brad House <brad_mssw@g.o>
To: Mental Patient <mental@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-sources bug in ieee1394 module?
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:28:45
Message-Id: 64961.68.105.173.45.1076866124.squirrel@mail.mainstreetsoftworks.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-sources bug in ieee1394 module? by Mental Patient
1 gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.2 should be fine ...
2 2.6.3_rc2 is not happy.
3 I do not know what gentoo-test-sources is ...
4
5 This is also a problem in vanilla, and not an issue
6 with the patches applied by gentoo-dev-sources.
7
8 -Brad
9
10 > Forgive me if this is the wrong list, but I seem to be having a problem
11 > with the ieee driver in the latest version of gentoo-dev-sources
12 > (2.6.3_rc2).
13 >
14 > I'd been running the stable (2.6.1-rc1) version for a while. I was
15 > having problems getting a couple usb devices working (Canon digital
16 > camera and Nomad jukebox). I'd heard on gentoo-user that upgrading to
17 > 2.6.2 had resolved this issue for someone else. When I tried to get
18 > 2.6.2 via gentoo-test-sources, it was masked. Setting ACCEPT_KEYWORDS
19 > didnt help, so thats when I upgraded gentoo-dev-sources.
20 >
21 > My issue with the usb devices is resolved. Everything works great.
22 > However, on boot hotplug tried to load the ieee1394 module. Currently I
23 > dont have any firewire devices or anything that uses the port, so I've
24 > removed support from the kernel to work around the oops. But this used
25 > to work in 2.6.1-rc1. Or at least it didnt used to oops :)
26 >
27 > Anyways, this is an FYI in case no one has mentioned it. The port in
28 > question is on a creative labs audigy. The stack trace is below. If this
29 > is something I should take upstream to lkml, let me know. I'm just not
30 > sure if its a vanilla kernel problem or a gentoo post patch issue.
31 >
32 >
33 > Thanks for your consideration. If there are any other details I can
34 > provide, let me know. I've only been using gentoo for a couple months so
35 > I'm not sure of proceedure in many cases.
36 >
37 >
38 >
39 > ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[00023c00200083aa]
40 > Badness in kobject_get at lib/kobject.c:431
41 > Call Trace:
42 > [<c022e0dc>] kobject_get+0x4c/0x50
43 > [<c02846a8>] get_device+0x18/0x30
44 > [<c0285323>] bus_for_each_dev+0x63/0xc0
45 > [<f890861d>] nodemgr_node_probe+0x4d/0x130 [ieee1394]
46 > [<f89084e0>] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394]
47 > [<f8908a79>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x179/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
48 > [<f8908900>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
49 > [<c0109289>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
50 >
51 > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address b828ec83
52 > printing eip:
53 > b828ec83
54 > *pde = 00000000
55 > Oops: 0000 [#1]
56 > CPU: 0
57 > EIP: 0060:[<b828ec83>] Not tainted
58 > EFLAGS: 00010282
59 > EIP is at 0xb828ec83
60 > eax: b828ec83 ebx: f8914c04 ecx: f754df9c edx: 00000000
61 > esi: f8907ee0 edi: 00000000 ebp: f8906bb0 esp: f754df40
62 > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
63 > Process knodemgrd_0 (pid: 3443, threadinfo=f754c000 task=f7998040)
64 > Stack: c022e178 f8914c04 f8914be0 f8914be8 f8914b40 f7438044 c0285340
65 > f8914c04
66 > f754df9c f8914b8c 00000000 f743803c f754df9c f760d3d8 f754df9c
67 > f890861d
68 > f8914b40 f743803c f754df9c f89084e0 f7534000 f760d3d8 f7534000
69 > f760d3d8
70 > Call Trace:
71 > [<c022e178>] kobject_cleanup+0x98/0xa0
72 > [<c0285340>] bus_for_each_dev+0x80/0xc0
73 > [<f890861d>] nodemgr_node_probe+0x4d/0x130 [ieee1394]
74 > [<f89084e0>] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394]
75 > [<f8908a79>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x179/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
76 > [<f8908900>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
77 > [<c0109289>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
78 >
79 > Code: Bad EIP value.
80 > <6>eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability
81 > of 45e1.
82 > blk: queue f7dd6a00, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
83 > blk: queue f7dd6600, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
84 > blk: queue f7dcaa00, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
85 > svc: unknown version (3)
86 > request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- char-major-226-0. error = 256
87 >
88 >
89 >
90 > --
91 > Mental (Mental@××××××××××.com)
92 >
93 > Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.
94 >
95 > GPG public key: http://www.neverlight.com/pas/Mental.asc
96 >
97 >
98 > --
99 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
100 >
101 >
102 >
103
104
105 --
106 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-sources bug in ieee1394 module? John Mylchreest <johnm@g.o>