1 |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: |
3 |
> > On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
> >> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: |
5 |
> >>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is |
6 |
> >>> practically useless. |
7 |
> >>> |
8 |
> >>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his |
9 |
> >>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you |
10 |
> >>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). |
11 |
> >>> |
12 |
> >>> Let's just remove it. |
13 |
> >>> |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which |
16 |
> >> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to |
17 |
> >> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be |
18 |
> >> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. |
19 |
> >> |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > Why is it called "Package-Manager:" then? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Because repoman in bundled with portage, I guess. I suppose we could |
24 |
> change it to something else. |
25 |
|
26 |
How about the line below? |
27 |
|
28 |
Signed-off-by: <dev name> (repoman <version>) |
29 |
|
30 |
Cheers, |
31 |
—Guilherme |