1 |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:05 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 21/02/17 08:53, Lars Wendler wrote: |
4 |
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:47:17 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> >> Hey all, |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> 1) Putting printer drivers into "net-print" is silly. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> Something that converts format a to device-specific format b has |
11 |
> >> absolutely nothing to do with network. |
12 |
> >> So, a new category "sys-print", emphasizing that it's hardware |
13 |
> >> drivers, (or "cups-drv"?) (or maybe "media-print"?) might make sense. |
14 |
> > Like I said in IRC, I'm all in favor of this. "media-print" seems |
15 |
> > reasonable as I don't consider printing related packages being |
16 |
> > system-relevant (and thus no sys-print). |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> Maybe we can shoot for "app-print" .. its not really a system package |
20 |
> any more than a networking one, nor a (multi-)media package per-se (cue |
21 |
> bikeshed on what 'media' means) .. so perhaps just 'app-print' or |
22 |
> 'app-printing' .. I dunno .. |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
There is no requirement for category names to be x-y. Instead of forcing a |
26 |
prefix-suffix pattern that doesn't really fit, just call it "printing". |