1 |
Before I reply with a simple four letter words let me restate one |
2 |
thing and than that will be it, and my next move unless council/devrel |
3 |
stops this for good my time will be spent better: playing Baldur's |
4 |
Gate. |
5 |
|
6 |
The problem is not that I don't know python. Because I do know python (now). |
7 |
The problem is that pybugz DOES NOT SOLVE A FREAKING THING. |
8 |
|
9 |
I scan between 100 to 500 logs a day, any second it takes me to open a |
10 |
new bug adds to the likeliness I have no time to do so. Right now the |
11 |
filing is done purely through the browser so my Bugzilla |
12 |
authentication never leaves it. I get the failed log, I click on the |
13 |
"open bug" button, it prefills it, I leave a proper summary to point |
14 |
out what the problem is and block the proper bug. |
15 |
|
16 |
If the app were to just open the bug for me, the app would have to |
17 |
have the credentials, which means I have to have the app behind |
18 |
authentication. And as I pointed out multiple time I have no time or |
19 |
interest in supporting a properly authenticated app FOR ONE PERSON |
20 |
REFUSING TO READ A LOG. Because sure, it's not an impossible amount of |
21 |
work, but it's a disproportionate amount of work when only one person |
22 |
requires it, and another 200 are perfectly fine with clicking on a |
23 |
link to read a log. |
24 |
|
25 |
Same thing with pybugz as a CLI tool; sure I could have it store a |
26 |
copy of my credentials on my laptop and now copy-paste the bug ID |
27 |
after opening and the log URL. But no thanks because it makes opening |
28 |
a bug a >40 seconds operation and prone to more mistakes and, once |
29 |
again, this is disproportioned to ONE person refusing to accept a |
30 |
setup. |
31 |
|
32 |
So really, I'm tired to be insulted, and this was the last drop. Goodbye. |
33 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
34 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
On 21 November 2014 07:51, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
38 |
> On 11/20/14 5:04 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
39 |
>> Ok, added the RESO/NEEDINFO case, and bumped my polling time to 5 |
40 |
>> minute intervals. |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> Diego, please keep going, your efforts are still very much appreciated. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> +1, and thanks Ian for your script! |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Paweł |
47 |
> |