Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:26:56
Message-Id: 200410171229.09713.jstubbs@gentoo.org
1 Hi all,
2
3 GLEP23 (ACCEPT_LICENSE) is finally moving along. >=portage-2.0.51_rc8 includes
4 an updated check in repoman to ensure that LICENSEs follow the standard
5 DEPEND syntax. LICENSEs can (and should) be updated to use the new syntax if
6 you are using a portage that supports it. There is no backward compatibility
7 issues as use of LICENSE is limited to the repoman check and --search
8 display.
9
10 The other part of the GLEP that needs to be finalized is with regard to
11 license grouping. There are a couple of minor issues that need to be
12 discussed and any issues brought up before everything is implemented. Those
13 that I can think of are:
14
15 * Group prefix character? Previously '@' was suggested
16 * Uppercase or lowercase?
17 * Does "@group1 -@group2" make sense? What is the behaviour?
18 * Where will the groups be stored? profiles/license.groups seems to fit.
19 * How will the groups be stored?
20
21 USE groups will more than likely be implemented at the same time as this and
22 will follow the same sceme, so be aware of that when expressing any opinions.
23
24 I ask that people look over the GLEP once more and bring up any other points
25 of concern as well. Speak now or forever hold your piece. ;)
26
27 Regards,
28 Jason Stubbs
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies