| 1 |
On 08/12/04 Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Thursday 12 August 2004 14:29, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 7 |
> > On 08/12/04 Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Portage%20Development |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > No, eclasses do *not* belong to portage. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Um, and what else? I always thought |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> #Core - Ebuild Support dev-portage@g.o |
| 15 |
> #Bugs and enhancements relating to tools and functions that aid the |
| 16 |
> #development and execution of ebuilds. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> would include base.eclass, eutils.eclass, .... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
No, that part is for ebuild.sh and other stuff installed in |
| 21 |
/usr/lib/portage/bin. In general everything that is in the tree doesn't |
| 22 |
fit under "portage development". |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Marius |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives